Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/Demote Gatuti789 (April 2015)

I think Gatuti should be demoted because he isn't really active on the wiki. Seriously, I checked his contribs and he hasn't edited since January 22^nd. What do YOU think? -- (t|c|e) 23:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Vote (0)

For (2)

• --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 23:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
• --Chill57181 Talk Contribs 17:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Against (2)

1. CK 00:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
2. --Perapin
   04:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• Me and LordMaster96 were just discussing this the other day. Demotion is most likely going to happen. --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 23:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
• Gatuti has started high school. He probably doesn't have much time to edit now. --Juca (discussão/talk) 00:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
• I'm going to hold off on voting for now. This vote might've been a better idea for the summer, when most people get out of school. --$harkbate ^{Talk Page} 05:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
• I agree with the fact that he's inactive but I was thinking of giving him until May or so. --LordMaster96 22:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
• He should be given until the summer, cuz activity spikes and stuff, then maybe we can have a vote. Mario Rk ^{(T · C)} 03:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Alright, that seems fair; I'm willing to give him the benefit here. If we don't hear anything from him within the next few weeks, the vote will close and he will be demoted. --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 17:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

• He hasn't edited for three months and didn't give any notice prior, otherwise he would've been marked as Away on the adminlist. It's probably time. --Chill57181 Talk Contribs 17:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
• He has been inactive, but he's always a pretty great admin when he's here. As bad as this is going to sound (I don't mean for it to come off as offensive), I don't find it very legitimate to demote Gatuti and keep some of our older admins who haven't played the game in years, or only contribute a few times a month. Our inactivity policy (like fanon's old version) is pretty vague about this stuff, so I don't see any harm in giving him a few more months to redeem himself. CK 00:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I give him until July 1st, if it's so he can get off on his winter break. --Refractor (talk) 01:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Who are you speaking of in this instance CK? --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 02:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Tigernose gets to keep his rights and what has he been doing lately? Not clever!
      --Perapin
      04:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Tigernose was demoted from his adminship/bureaucracy years ago. He's still a staffer because staffer rights are not within the community's control. --LordMaster96 05:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

• Well, Sea is mainly who I was thinking of. I appreciate him as our staffer and network CEO, but I don't really see why he's still an admin on the cpw except for those reasons. CK 06:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)