Welcome to the Club Penguin Wiki! Log in or Create an account to join the community!

Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/Bureaucrat requests

From the Club Penguin Wiki, the free, editable encyclopedia about Club Penguin
Revision as of 23:31, 22 June 2010 by imported>Russian One
Jump to navigation Jump to search

As you may have noticed, we only have one bureaucrat at the moment, and this is Hat Pop. The problem is, such a large wiki like us needs more than one bureaucrat for many reasons.

  1. Hat Pop is the only bureaucrat for over 100 active users. That's 1:100.
  2. Hat Pop is in the -5 time zone, and that does not cover the whole Earth. Sometimes, if a vote passes through, we have to wait in excess of a day for our one bureaucrat to go online.
  3. Hat Pop can sometimes be inactive, and that is a problem. Everybody is inactive at points obviously, but when we're relying on one user for our whole wiki, it can be a problem.
  4. I'm not being rude, but Hat Pop, in terms of bureaucrat, hasn't made any decisions of her own yet regarding promotions. It's often the other admins finding power abusers and etc, and it's a chore for us to message her and wait for a reply just to give rights to someone. One problem was with Sharkbate, we couldn't get to message Hat Pop to repromote Sharkbate, and he had to wait for days to get the rights.

Now these are the problems, and here is the solution. We fetch an active admin from GMT and an active admin from GMT -5. Me, Tigernose and Seahorseruler. I can assure you that we will provide on-time promotions and support. We're very experienced with wiki-ing, and have both experienced people getting promoted. Both of us have been bureaucrats on other wikis, and I will assure you we won't misuse our rights.

On the topic of Seahorseruler's recent argument with Ratonbat: it was nobody's fault. Ratonbat was unaware that it is a guideline to archive large talk pages and Seahorseruler was unaware that Ratonbat didn't know this and therefore Seahorseruler resulted in giving insufficient information. It's NOBODY'S FAULT.

So please, don't vote against because of these recent petty issues - especially when they mean nothing to you, or to anyone for the matter.

So it's simple. Yes or no.

  • Yes = Tigernose and Seahorseruler become bureaucrats. Hat Pop stays as bureaucrat, obviously.
  • No = Tigernose and Seahorseruler do not become bureaucrats.

Vote (+9)

Yes (9)

  1. Tigernose is in a different continent than all other admins, and Seahorse is always active. --LordMaster96 Talk to me! 21:33, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  2. --Hat Pop Bunny Ears Rule! 21:41, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I was thinking not to at first, but it sounds like a good idea. --Sonic The Hedgehog (Talk | Blog | Contribs) 21:43, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --$harkbate Talk2Meh 21:49, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  5. --Staffan15 (talk|contribs) 22:15, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Yeah! But, is Sea really gonna be a good b/crat? I don't think so....... Ozone! talk blog editcount contibs 22:28, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
    1. Just commenting: What makes you say that? --seahorseruler |Talk (EditCount) Yoshi! 22:43, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  7. We definitely need more bureacrats! --[ I i like pie. do u?] 22:32, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  8. I like it! --Gary the Gaget Dude Wanna talk? Contribs 22:54, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
  9. We need more bureaucrats, but we definitely need Seahorseruler and Tigernose to be very good bureaucrats. I'm a little concerned though, because Seahorseruler says "hello" too much, and Tigernose does some things without really voting... --Jeffwang16 23:25, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

No (0)

  1. [User:Russian One|Russian One]] Nothing to Lose 23:31, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments