Club Penguin Wiki:Archive/Bureaucrat requests

As you may have noticed, we only have one bureaucrat at the moment, and this is Hat Pop. The problem is, such a large wiki like us needs more than one bureaucrat for many reasons.

1. Hat Pop is the only bureaucrat for over 100 active users. That's 1:100.
2. Hat Pop is in the -5 time zone, and that does not cover the whole Earth. Sometimes, if a vote passes through, we have to wait in excess of a day for our one bureaucrat to go online.
3. Hat Pop can sometimes be inactive, and that is a problem. Everybody is inactive at points obviously, but when we're relying on one user for our whole wiki, it can be a problem.
4. I'm not being rude, but Hat Pop, in terms of bureaucrat, hasn't made any decisions of her own yet regarding promotions. It's often the other admins finding power abusers and etc, and it's a chore for us to message her and wait for a reply just to give rights to someone. One problem was with Sharkbate, we couldn't get to message Hat Pop to re-promote Sharkbate, and he had to wait for days to get the rights.

Now these are the problems, and here is the solution. We fetch an active admin from GMT and an active admin from GMT -5. Me, Tigernose and Seahorseruler. I can assure you that we will provide on-time promotions and support. We're very experienced with wiki-ing, and have both experienced people getting promoted. Both of us have been bureaucrats on other wikis, and I will assure you we won't misuse our rights.

On the topic of Seahorseruler's recent argument with Ratonbat: it was nobody's fault. Ratonbat was unaware that it is a guideline to archive large talk pages and Seahorseruler was unaware that Ratonbat didn't know this and therefore Seahorseruler resulted in giving insufficient information. It's NOBODY'S FAULT.

So please, don't vote against because of these recent petty issues - especially when they mean nothing to you, or to anyone for the matter.

So it's simple. Yes or no.

• Yes = Tigernose and Seahorseruler become bureaucrats. Hat Pop stays as bureaucrat, obviously.
• No = Tigernose and Seahorseruler do not become bureaucrats.

Vote (+16)

Yes (18)

1. Tigernose is in a different continent than all other admins, and Seahorse is always active. --LordMaster96 ^{Talk to me!} 21:33, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
2. --Hat Pop ^{Bunny Ears Rule!} 21:41, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
3. I was thinking not to at first, but it sounds like a good idea. --Sonic The Hedgehog (Talk | Blog | Contribs) 21:43, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
4. --$harkbate ^Talk2Meh 21:49, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
5. --Staffan15 ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:15, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
6. Yeah! But, is Sea really gonna be a good b/crat? I don't think so....... Ozone! talk blog editcount contibs 22:28, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
7. We definitely need more bureacrats! --[ I i like pie. do u?] 22:32, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
8. I like it! --Gary the Gaget Dude ^{Wanna talk? • Contribs} 22:54, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
9. We need more bureaucrats, but we definitely need Seahorseruler and Tigernose to be very good bureaucrats. I'm a little concerned though, because Seahorseruler says "hello" too much, and Tigernose does some things without really voting... --Jeffwang16 23:25, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
10. Wait! We have only ONE!?!? Something needs to be done about it! Also, 10th person to say yes! Yay! --The only user (that I know of) on the wiki with every pin - bigpboy 00:10, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
11. As of right now, I think that having 3 b-crats is better. Wonderweez 01:50, June 23, 2010 (UTC)Wonderweez
12. Actually, I don't think too many b-crats is a problem.-Pingali Moi ^{Summer! HOT! No worries} 06:07, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
13. I like how when I talk about this very subject, it gets ignored so you do it anyway. Tigernose, 100% yes. Sea, Idk, I mean, he can be rude, but he's the most professional you're gonna get here so I guess. --{{SUBST:Template:EMsig}} 09:56, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
14. Yes, we need more B-Crats here =D, One is not enough to run a wiki. --Sk8rbluscat ^{TALK 2 ME!t} 16:45, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
15. Sure. I don't know why I should vote, I don't think my vote should count since I don't edit here. But Tigernose and Seahorseruler are very responsible and I don't think of them as power abusive. So, yeah, I vote yes. --YorkayFile:Smiley.gifTheFile:Smiley.gifPorkayFile:Smiley.gif 16:47, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
16. Yes, they should become b-crats. -Veeonott
17. Yeah, these guys really deserve it. They are both superb editors and are very active. Burpy678^{A glove being punched?!}Now that is IRONY! 21:41, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
18. :)Jelloratbob:) ^{My talk page | My edits} 00:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

No (2)

1. Russian One^{Nothing to Lose} 23:34, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
2. Why more, we dont have a lot of promotions, and if we do, users could be patient...--Ratonbat 00:06, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Ratonbat, that's not the problem. You're being hypothetical. What if there is a promotion? There certainly was when tried to get Sharkbate back his rights, but it took long to contact our one bureaucrat. Life's a lot easier with three bureaucrats than one, whatever the weather. --Tigernose Chat • Edits 16:40, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
• Exactly, Tigernose, the only bad thing about Sea being a bureaucrat, is the fact he is in the same time zone as Hat Pop, but that doesn't stop him from being a good bureaucrat. --Sk8rbluscat ^{TALK 2 ME!t} 16:54, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Still, I am usually up until 2 am, so I cover a lot of time zones. --seahorseruler |Talk (EditCount) Yoshi! 18:39, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

That's true. Not to be rude, Hat Pop, but Seahorseruler is on as much as possible, and is also very skilled at Wikicode, making him an excellent admin and possibly a great bureaucrat, and when he goes to sleep (2 AM), it would be 7 AM for Tigernose. --LordMaster96 ^{Talk to me!} 20:12, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Sea: I'm up 'till 2 AM too. :P --Sk8rbluscat ^{TALK 2 ME!t} 00:06, June 24, 2010 (UTC)